footnote-policy.html 11.4 KB
Newer Older
Fred Chasen's avatar
Fred Chasen committed
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC>
<html lang="en" lang="en">

<head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" />
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" />
    <title>
Fred Chasen's avatar
Fred Chasen committed
8
        Footnotes Policy
Fred Chasen's avatar
Fred Chasen committed
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
    </title>

    <!-- Paged js-->
    <script src="../../../dist/paged.polyfill.js"></script>
    <style>
        body {
            widows: 1;
            orphans: 1;
        }

        @media screen {
            .pagedjs_page {
                box-shadow: 0 0 0 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2);
            }
        }

        .footnote-auto {
            font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
            font-size: 12px;
            line-height: 14px;
            margin-top: 16px;
            color: grey;
        }

        .footnote-line {
            font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
            font-size: 12px;
            line-height: 14px;
            margin-top: 16px;
            color: rgb(32, 25, 25);
        }

        .footnote-block {
            font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
            font-size: 12px;
            line-height: 14px;
            margin-top: 16px;
            color: rgb(63, 62, 62);
        }


        @page {
            size: 160mm 210mm;
            margin-top: 83px;
            margin-bottom: 86px;
            margin-left: 35mm;
            margin-right: 35mm;

            @bottom-left {
                content: counter(page);
            }

            @footnote {
                border-top: dashed red 1px;
                margin-top: 12px;
                float: bottom;
            }
        }

        span.footnote-auto {
            float: footnote;
            footnote-policy: auto;
        }

        .footnote-auto::footnote-call {
            color: red;
        }

        .footnote-auto::footnote-marker {
            color: blue;
        }

        span.footnote-line {
            float: footnote;
            footnote-policy: line;
        }

        .footnote-line::footnote-call {
            color: green;
        }

        .footnote-line::footnote-marker {
            color: purple;
        }

        span.footnote-block {
            float: footnote;
            footnote-policy: block;
        }

        .footnote-block::footnote-call {
            color: peru;
        }

        .footnote-block::footnote-marker {
            color: olivedrab;
        }
        

        p {
            font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif;
            margin-top: 0;
            margin-bottom: 0;
            text-align: justify;
            font-size: 14px;
            line-height: 16px;
        }



        .afnanch {
            display: none;
        }

        hr {
            border: none;
        }

        .pfirst {
            padding-top: 50mm;
        }

        section {
            break-after: always;
        }
    </style>



</head>

<body>
    <section>
        <p>the passage from Xylography to Typography. Those who write on the
            affirmative side of the question profess to see in the earlier typographical works,
            as well as in the historical statements handed down by the
            old authorities, the clearest evidence that wooden types were used, and that several of the most
            famous works of the first printers were executed by their means.</p>
        
        <p>As regards the latter source of their confidence, it is at least remarkable
            that no single writer of the fifteenth century makes the slightest allusion to the
            use of wooden types. Indeed, it was not till Bibliander, in 1548,<span class="footnote-auto" data-note="04"
                id="note-04"><em>In Commentatione de ratione
                    communi omnium linguarum et
                    literarum.</em> Tiguri, 1548, p. 80.</span>
            first mentioned
            and described them, that anything professing to be a record on the subject
            existed. “First they cut their letters,” he says, “on wood blocks the size of an
            entire page, but because the labour and cost of that way was so great, they devised
            movable wooden types, perforated and joined one to the other by a thread.”</p>
        
        <p>The legend, once started, found no lack of sponsors, and the typographical
            histories of the sixteenth century and onward abound with testimonies confirmatory
            more or less of Bibliander’s statement. Of these testimonies, those only
            are worthy of attention which profess to be based on actual inspection of the
            alleged perforated wooden types. Specklin
            (who died in 1589) asserts that he
            saw some of these relics at Strasburg<span class="footnote-auto" data-note="05" id="note-05">In <em>Chronico
                    Argentoratensi</em>, <em>m.s.</em> ed. Jo.
                Schilterus,
                p. 442. “Ich habe die erste press, auch die buchstaben gesehen, waren
                von holtz geschnitten, auch gäntze wörter und syllaben, hatten löchle,
                und fasst man an ein schnur nacheinander mit einer nadel, zoge sie
                darnach den zeilen in die länge,” etc.</span>. Angelo Roccha,<span class="footnote-auto" data-note="06"
                id="note-06"><em>De Bibliothecâ Vaticanâ.</em> Romæ, 1591, p. 412.
                “Characteres enim a primis illis inventoribus non ita eleganter et
                expedite, ut a nostris fieri solet, sed filo in litterarum foramen
                immisso connectebantur, sicut Venetiis id genus typos me vidisse
                memini.”</span>
            in 1591, vouches for the
            existence of similar letters (though he does not say whether wood or metal) at
            Venice. </p>
    </section>
    <section>
        <p>the passage from Xylography to Typography. Those who write on the
            affirmative side of the question profess to see in the earlier typographical works,
            as well as in the historical statements handed down by the
            old authorities, the clearest evidence that wooden types were used, and that several of the most
            famous works of the first printers were executed by their means.</p>
    
        <p>As regards the latter source of their confidence, it is at least remarkable
            that no single writer of the fifteenth century makes the slightest allusion to the
            use of wooden types. Indeed, it was not till Bibliander, in 1548,<span class="footnote-line" data-note="04"
                id="note-04"><em>In Commentatione de ratione
                    communi omnium linguarum et
                    literarum.</em> Tiguri, 1548, p. 80.</span>
            first mentioned
            and described them, that anything professing to be a record on the subject
            existed. “First they cut their letters,” he says, “on wood blocks the size of an
            entire page, but because the labour and cost of that way was so great, they devised
            movable wooden types, perforated and joined one to the other by a thread.”</p>
    
        <p>The legend, once started, found no lack of sponsors, and the typographical
            histories of the sixteenth century and onward abound with testimonies confirmatory
            more or less of Bibliander’s statement. Of these testimonies, those only
            are worthy of attention which profess to be based on actual inspection of the
            alleged perforated wooden types. Specklin
            (who died in 1589) asserts that he
            saw some of these relics at Strasburg<span class="footnote-line" data-note="05" id="note-05">In <em>Chronico
                    Argentoratensi</em>, <em>m.s.</em> ed. Jo.
                Schilterus,
                p. 442. “Ich habe die erste press, auch die buchstaben gesehen, waren
                von holtz geschnitten, auch gäntze wörter und syllaben, hatten löchle,
                und fasst man an ein schnur nacheinander mit einer nadel, zoge sie
                darnach den zeilen in die länge,” etc.</span>. Angelo Roccha,<span class="footnote-line" data-note="06"
                id="note-06"><em>De Bibliothecâ Vaticanâ.</em> Romæ, 1591, p. 412.
                “Characteres enim a primis illis inventoribus non ita eleganter et
                expedite, ut a nostris fieri solet, sed filo in litterarum foramen
                immisso connectebantur, sicut Venetiis id genus typos me vidisse
                memini.”</span>
            in 1591, vouches for the
            existence of similar letters (though he does not say whether wood or metal) at
            Venice. </p>
    </section>
    <section>
        <p>the passage from Xylography to Typography. Those who write on the
            affirmative side of the question profess to see in the earlier typographical works,
            as well as in the historical statements handed down by the
            old authorities, the clearest evidence that wooden types were used, and that several of the most
            famous works of the first printers were executed by their means.</p>
    
        <p>As regards the latter source of their confidence, it is at least remarkable
            that no single writer of the fifteenth century makes the slightest allusion to the
            use of wooden types. Indeed, it was not till Bibliander, in 1548,<span class="footnote-block" data-note="04"
                id="note-04"><em>In Commentatione de ratione
                    communi omnium linguarum et
                    literarum.</em> Tiguri, 1548, p. 80.</span>
            first mentioned
            and described them, that anything professing to be a record on the subject
            existed. “First they cut their letters,” he says, “on wood blocks the size of an
            entire page, but because the labour and cost of that way was so great, they devised
            movable wooden types, perforated and joined one to the other by a thread.”</p>
    
        <p>The legend, once started, found no lack of sponsors, and the typographical
            histories of the sixteenth century and onward abound with testimonies confirmatory
            more or less of Bibliander’s statement. Of these testimonies, those only
            are worthy of attention which profess to be based on actual inspection of the
            alleged perforated wooden types. Specklin
            (who died in 1589) asserts that he
            saw some of these relics at Strasburg<span class="footnote-block" data-note="05" id="note-05">In <em>Chronico
                    Argentoratensi</em>, <em>m.s.</em> ed. Jo.
                Schilterus,
                p. 442. “Ich habe die erste press, auch die buchstaben gesehen, waren
                von holtz geschnitten, auch gäntze wörter und syllaben, hatten löchle,
                und fasst man an ein schnur nacheinander mit einer nadel, zoge sie
                darnach den zeilen in die länge,” etc.</span>. Angelo Roccha,<span class="footnote-block" data-note="06"
                id="note-06"><em>De Bibliothecâ Vaticanâ.</em> Romæ, 1591, p. 412.
                “Characteres enim a primis illis inventoribus non ita eleganter et
                expedite, ut a nostris fieri solet, sed filo in litterarum foramen
                immisso connectebantur, sicut Venetiis id genus typos me vidisse
                memini.”</span>
            in 1591, vouches for the
            existence of similar letters (though he does not say whether wood or metal) at
            Venice. </p>
    </section>
</body>

</html>